Research framework
- Analysis criteria
38 analysis criteria

Our frame of reference counts 38 generic criteria, divided in 6 distinct fields.
Human Resources
Constant improvement of professional and labor relations, as well as of working conditions.
Internationally recognised reference texts are:
Human Rights at workplacesRespect of trade unions’ freedom and promotion of collective negotiation, non-discrimination and promotion of equality, eradication of banned working practices (Child and enforced labor), prevention of inhumane or humiliating treatments such as sexual harassment, protection of private life and personal data.
EnvironmentProtection, safeguard, prevention of attacks on environment, implementation of an adequate managerial strategy, ecodesign, protection of biodiversity and reasonable control of environmental impacts on the overall life cycle of products and services.
-
UN: Rio Declaration
Business BehaviourTaking into account of clients’ rights and interests, integration of social and environmental standards both in the process of selection of suppliers and in the overall supplying chain, efficient prevention of corruption, and respect of competition laws.
Corporate GovernanceEfficiency and integrity, insurance of both independence and effectiveness of the Board of Directors, effectiveness and efficiency of audit and control systems, and in particular inclusion of social responsibility risks, respect of shareholders’ rights and most of all of the minorities, transparency and moderation in executive remuneration.
Community involvementEffectiveness, managerial integration of commitment, contribution to economic and social development of the territories of establishment and their human communities, concrete commitment in favor of the control of societal impacts of products and services, transparent and participative contribution to causes of general interest.
- Opposability
Commitment towards opposability
Definition
In order to realize their Corporate Social Responsibility, States and companies must comply with and promote principles (or recommendations, conventions, etc.) that are issued by international institutions with this intent.
These principles have a universal impact.
It is not only advisable to take them into account and promote them, but also necessary, since any involved actor worldwide may invoke them. These principles are, therefore, opposable to any company.

In addition to these opposable principles, other standards do exist:
The companies/organizations we analyze may also adhere to private standards or initiatives (certificates, labels or guidelines).
These may be of a general nature or specific to a sector, and may be – combined with other quantitative and qualitative factors – indicators of:
- visibility
- content
- resources adequacy
- control
- reporting
- strictness of processes
Examples



Adherence to Global Compact
Certification ISO 14001 of the environmental management system Collaboration with Amnesty International


Certification EMAS of the environmental management system (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) Collaboration with Transparency International (Guidelines for the fight against corruption in companies) These elements contribute – within the limits of both their intrinsic and sectorial relevancy – to our control of managerial systems.




